Background
- While the NHS is amply provided with medical research databases (Pubmed, Medline, Cochrane, etc.) there was, until the Patient Experience Library, no equivalent for patient experience research.
- While bodies like NICE have research prioritisation processes to ensure that research funding and effort is well targeted, there is no systematic prioritisation in patent experience work. No-one has a strategic overview of strengths and weaknesses in the patient experience evidence base.
- Clinicians are given analytical tools and diagnostic aids to help them translate research into practice. There are few, if any, good quality analytical tools for patient experience data.
If you look at bodies like National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), they have very clear processes for research prioritisation.
I realised that in patient experience work, nobody anywhere had any handle on who was doing what in terms of the research. What that meant was – and we observed this with the literature coming into the library – there were tonnes of reports on very common issues like patient experience with trying to get an appointment with their GP that all say more or less the same thing, so the time and effort being spent isn’t really adding to the sum of knowledge. At the same time, in other areas of the evidence base there are big gaps and a lot of that is in the area of health inequality; if you want to look at the experience of Armed Forces veterans in healthcare, a lot of them when they come out of the service have things like PTSD, sometimes they have drug and alcohol problems, difficulty readjusting to society and then that gives them health problems as well – there’s not a huge amount of literature about their experiences in healthcare, and there’s many other similarly overlooked groups.
How has EPIC helped the Patient Experience Library?
That was fantastic – it felt like a really big breakthrough because it was the first time that anybody has ever attempted to understand this whole body of research. There’s millions of pounds going in and more and more research done every year and yet nobody had a handle on how we’re prioritising it. So for a very small amount of time and investment from EPIC we got huge value out of it. What was fantastic as well was that EPIC’s approach – because it’s about innovation – is that we found a funder who was willing to take a risk on this.
What’s next for the Patient Experience Library?
In the area of healthcare there’s so much funding that you can only get if you’re an NHS body or a charity – for us as a social enterprise to be able to apply to the Challenge Fund was fantastic because the opportunities are very limited. It enabled us to show what we were trying to achieve, which then opened that door to the further development funding and work.